| "Pseudomonas maltophilia" Hugh and Ryschenkow 1961| AS 1.1788| ATCC 13637| ATCC 19861 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| ATCC 700475 [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| BCRC 10737| CCM 1640| CCRC 10737| CCRC:10737| CCUG 41684 [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| CCUG 5866| CFBP 3035| CFBP 4337 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| CIP 104854 [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| CIP 60.77| DSM 50170| IAM 12423| ICMP 17033| ICMP 2820 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| IFO 14161| IMET 10402| JCM 1975| LMG 22072 [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| LMG 958| LMG 978 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| LMG:22072 [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| LMG:958| LMG:978 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| MTCC 434| NBRC 14161| NCAIM B.01119| NCCB 68018| NCIMB 9203| NCPPB 1974| NCPPB 323 [[Pseudomonas beteli]]| NCTC 10257| NRC 729| NRRL B-2756| Pseudomonas beteli| Pseudomonas beteli corrig. (Ragunathan 1928) Savulescu 1947 (Approved Lists 1980)| Pseudomonas betle| Pseudomonas maltiphilia| Pseudomonas maltophilia| Pseudomonas sp. LMG 20596| RH 1168| Stenotrophomonas africana| Stenotrophomonas africana Drancourt et al. 1997| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1981) Palleroni and Bradbury 1993| Stenotrophomonas sp. ES-5| Stenotrophomonas sp. ISSDS-759| Stenotrophomonas sp. ISSDS-801| Stenotrophomonas sp. ISSDS-818| Stenotrophomonas sp. K6303-5-2b| Stenotrophomonas sp. OUC_Est10| Stenotrophomonas sp. T6220-6-1b| strain Hugh 810-2| strain MGB [[Stenotrophomonas africana]]| strain Stanier 67| VKM B-591| Xanthomonadaceae bacterium OG-2| Xanthomonas maltiphilia| Xanthomonas maltophilia| Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1981) Swings et al. 1983 emend. van den Mooter and Swings 1990
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
Statistics | NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.22 | 4 | 130 | 0 | 166 | 56.8 | 40 | 55.9 | 4 | 130 | 14.3 %ile | 71.4 %ile | ||
biomesight | 0.46 | 20 | 150 | 0 | 116 | 40 | 20 | 38.7 | 20 | 150 | 7.7 %ile | 84.6 %ile | ||
thorne | 93.1 | 3 | 98 | 0 | 57 | 17.4 | 12 | 20.1 | 0 | 26 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile | ||
thryve | 0.99 | 14 | 44 | 9 | 47 | 27.9 | 26 | 9.8 | 14 | 44 | 7.7 %ile | 84.6 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thorne (20/80%ile) | 5.29 | 12.71 | 0.0005 | 0.0013 |
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BiomeSight | 0.54 % | 0.003 % | 0.003 % | 16.0 | 2963 |
bugspeak | 100 % | 0.013 % | % | 1.0 | 1 |
CerbaLab | 66.667 % | 0.001 % | 0 % | 2.0 | 3 |
es-xenogene | 6.897 % | 0.007 % | 0.004 % | 2.0 | 29 |
Thorne | 75.962 % | 0.001 % | 0.001 % | 79.0 | 104 |
Thryve | 0.863 % | 0.003 % | 0.001 % | 12.0 | 1390 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.
Data comes from FoodMicrobionet. For the meaning of weight, see that site. The bacteria does not need to be alive to have an effect.
This is an Academic site. It generates theoretical models of what may benefit a specific microbiome results.
Explanations/Info/Descriptions are influenced by Large Language Models and may not be accurate and include some hallucinations. Please report any to us for correction.
Copyright 2016-2024 Lassesen Consulting, LLC [2007], DBA, Microbiome Prescription. All rights served.
Permission to data scrap or reverse engineer is explicitly denied to all users. U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 47 Β§β―1030, CETS No.185, CFAA
Use of data on this site is prohibited except under written license. There is no charge for individual personal use. Use for any commercial applications or research requires a written license.
Caveat emptor: Analysis and suggestions are based on modelling (and thus infererence) based on studies. The data sources are usually given for those that wish to consider alternative inferences. theories and models.
Inventions/Methodologies on this site are Patent Pending.
Microbiome Prescription do not make any representations that data or analyses available on this site is suitable for human diagnostic purposes, for informing treatment decisions, or for any other purposes and accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever for such use.
This site is not Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliant.