| "Micrococcus rubens" Migula| "Sarcina erythromyxa" Chester 1901| ATCC 186| ATCC 187 [[Kocuria erythromyxa (Brooks and Murray 1981) Rainey et al. 1997]]| ATCC 49321 [[Pelczaria aurantia Poston 1994]]| CCM 679| CCUG 4312| CIP 106741 [[Pelczaria aurantia Poston 1994]]| CIP 71.15| Deinococcus erythromyxa| Deinococcus erythromyxa (ex Chester 1901) Brooks and Murray 1981| DSM 12801 [[Pelczaria aurantia Poston 1994]]| DSM 20447| IEGM 394| IFO 3768| JCM 11614| Kocuria erythromyxa| Kocuria erythromyxa (Brooks and Murray 1981) Rainey et al. 1997| Kocuria rosea| Kocuria rosea (Flugge 1886) Stackebrandt et al. 1995| LMG 14224| LMG:14224| Micrococcus roseus| Micrococcus roseus Flugge 1886 (Approved Lists 1980)| Micrococcus rubens| NBRC 3768| NCTC 7523| NRRL B-2977| Pelczaria aurantia| Pelczaria aurantia Poston 1994| Sarcina erythromyxa| UWO 1045 [[Kocuria erythromyxa (Brooks and Murray 1981) Rainey et al. 1997]]| VKM B-1823
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
Statistics | NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.04 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 %ile | 99 %ile | |||||
biomesight | 1.55 | 10 | 150 | 0 | 75 | 26.5 | 20 | 24.9 | 20 | 20 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile | ||
thorne | 37.93 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 16 | 5.3 | 3 | 5.6 | 2 | 20 | 7.7 %ile | 84.6 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BiomeSight | 1.384 % | 0.003 % | 0.002 % | 41.0 | 2962 |
CerbaLab | 33.333 % | 0 % | % | 1.0 | 3 |
Thorne | 23.762 % | 0 % | 0 % | 24.0 | 101 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.
This is an Academic site. It generates theoretical models of what may benefit a specific microbiome results.
Explanations/Info/Descriptions are influenced by Large Language Models and may not be accurate and include some hallucinations. Please report any to us for correction.
Copyright 2016-2024 Lassesen Consulting, LLC [2007], DBA, Microbiome Prescription. All rights served.
Permission to data scrap or reverse engineer is explicitly denied to all users. U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 47 Β§β―1030, CETS No.185, CFAA
Use of data on this site is prohibited except under written license. There is no charge for individual personal use. Use for any commercial applications or research requires a written license.
Caveat emptor: Analysis and suggestions are based on modelling (and thus infererence) based on studies. The data sources are usually given for those that wish to consider alternative inferences. theories and models.
Inventions/Methodologies on this site are Patent Pending.
Microbiome Prescription do not make any representations that data or analyses available on this site is suitable for human diagnostic purposes, for informing treatment decisions, or for any other purposes and accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever for such use.
This site is not Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliant.