Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Details: NCBI 1360, low G+C gram-positive [subspecies]

| "Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacitilactis (sic)" (Garvie and Farrow 1982) Schleifer et al. 1986| "Streptococcus diacetilactis" Matuszewski et al. 1936| ATCC 15577 [[Lactobacillus xylosus]]| Lactobacillus xylosus| Lactobacillus xylosus Kitahara 1938 (Approved Lists 1980)| Lactococcus lactis (SUBSP. LACTIS)| Lactococcus lactis lactis| Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis| Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (Lister 1873) Schleifer et al. 1986| LMG 7760 [[Lactobacillus xylosus]]| LMG:7760 [[Lactobacillus xylosus]]| Streptococcus diacetilactis| Streptococcus lactis subsp. diacetilactis| Streptococcus lactis subsp. diacetilactis (ex Matuszewski et al. 1936) Garvie and Farrow 1982| Streptococcus lactis subsp. lactis| Streptococcus lactis subsp. lactis (Lister 1873) Lohnis 1909

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

More Information
Statistics NCBI Data Punk End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)
LabFrequencyUD-LowUD-HighKM LowKM HighLab LowLab HighMean MedianStandard DeviationBox Plot LowBox Plot High KM Percentile Low KM Percentile High
Other Labs 0.57 10 2860 0 2391 603.8 110 911.9 10 2860 6.7 %ile 86.7 %ile
thorne 82.76 1 1717 0 772 91.7 8 347.1 2 100 0 %ile 100 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis

Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (NCBI 1360) per million
Source of Ranges Low Boundary High Boundary Low Boundary %age High Boundary %age
XenoGene 600 1000 0.06 0.1
Statistic by Lab Source for Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis
These desired values are reported from the lab reports
Lab Frequency Seen Average Standard Deviation Sample Count Lab Samples
CosmosId 18.75 %   0.055 %  0.114 % 6.0 32
custom 13.115 %   0.003 %  0 % 8.0 61
es-xenogene 48.276 %   0.034 %  0.061 % 14.0 29
Thorne 49.02 %   0.006 %  0.024 % 50.0 102

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

Data Contradictions β€” Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

πŸ§™? Search Hints:
General Substance Specific Substance Effect
Diet Style high-fat diets 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) dairy 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) Far infrared Sauna 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) soy 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) wheat bran 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Herb or Spice annatto 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Herb or Spice Slippery Elm 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Miscellaneous, food additives, and other odd items co2 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar arabinogalactan (prebiotic) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar oligosaccharides (prebiotic) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Probiotics bacillus laterosporus (probiotic) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Sugar and similar galactose (milk sugar) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Sugar and similar raffinose(sugar beet) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Vitamins, Minerals and similar vitamin d 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.

This is an Academic site. It generates theoretical models of what may benefit a specific microbiome results.

Explanations/Info/Descriptions are influenced by Large Language Models and may not be accurate and include some hallucinations. Please report any to us for correction.

Copyright 2016-2024 Lassesen Consulting, LLC [2007], DBA, Microbiome Prescription. All rights served.
Permission to data scrap or reverse engineer is explicitly denied to all users. U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 47 Β§β€―1030, CETS No.185, CFAA
Use of data on this site is prohibited except under written license. There is no charge for individual personal use. Use for any commercial applications or research requires a written license.
Caveat emptor: Analysis and suggestions are based on modelling (and thus infererence) based on studies. The data sources are usually given for those that wish to consider alternative inferences. theories and models.
Inventions/Methodologies on this site are Patent Pending.

Microbiome Prescription do not make any representations that data or analyses available on this site is suitable for human diagnostic purposes, for informing treatment decisions, or for any other purposes and accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever for such use.
This site is not Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliant.